valueflows

valueflows docs
git clone https://s.sonu.ch/~srfsh/valueflows.git
Log | Files | Refs | README

commit 3b1f3fd930312a570457282391d9969eab49b571
parent 8f444dbe6fae6a215fc02ec6d04a4575de412519
Author: Bob Haugen <bob.haugen@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed,  4 Nov 2015 05:15:03 -0600

First draft
Diffstat:
Ause-cases/shipping-2.md | 23+++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/use-cases/shipping-2.md b/use-cases/shipping-2.md @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +#[Sensorica 3D Printer](http://nrp.sensorica.co/accounting/exchange/466/) + +* Purchased from ORD Solutions in Waterloo, Ontario +* Tried to get a relative of a friend to bring it to Montreal, but he couldn't do it. +* Requested shipping from ORD Solutions. +* ORD Solutions arranged transportation with another company. +* ORD Solutions invoiced Sensorica for shipping, but the actual transportation process +was conducted by this other company who was not named in the invoice. + +This is a fairly typical scenario, in that three agents are involved: + +1. the agent who provided the goods +2. the agent who received the goods +3. the agent who provided the transportation service + +Except that often the agent who does the actual shipping is named, +and the package can be tracked, as in +[shipping-1](https://github.com/valueflows/valueflows/blob/master/use-cases/shipping-1.md). + +But regardless, many (or in this case all) of the details of the shipping process +happen in the context of the shipping agent. Some details may be published and thus +known to the other agents in the exchange, but mostly they don't know and they +don't care.