valueflows

valueflows docs
git clone https://s.sonu.ch/~srfsh/valueflows.git
Log | Files | Refs | README

dezentrale_deliberate_unclarity (4097B)


      1 [9:28:19 AM]Chris :
      2 we would like to see how far we can get without starting to track hours, like in the world out there 
      3 that we are trying to escape from (or some of us)
      4 [9:47:24 AM]Bob Haugen:
      5 I was asking in terms of tracking percentage of meals cooked vs percentage of cooking done.
      6 I think needs to be cooking done.
      7 [9:48:00 AM]Chris :
      8 percentage of cooking done, is what we are thinking currently
      9 [9:48:18 AM]Lynn Foster:
     10 ok let's try it out
     11 [9:48:23 AM]Chris :
     12 and tracking amount of meals served seperately
     13 [9:54:22 AM]Bob Haugen:
     14 How do the ingredients get tracked now? and how do you think you want to track them in OCP?
     15 [9:54:51 AM]Chris :
     16 we could track them like the base expenses
     17 it feels wrong to have it in the same "base cost categorie, but I can't think of why it should be different
     18 [10:03:52 AM]Bob Haugen:
     19 Would you want to track the consumption of ingredients and other inputs in any detail? Or just that 
     20 somebody bought something for the collective for X amount of money and you don't care what?
     21 [10:04:44 AM]Chris :
     22 I think we should start as generic as possible and get more detailed only when needed
     23 at the beginning we could try not to care
     24 [10:10:55 AM]Lynn Foster:
     25 so let me try to summarize:
     26 - week of meals
     27 - cooking % contribution (maybe separate, maybe goes into week of meals)
     28 - purchase contributions from people's pockets
     29 - purchases by the collective
     30 [10:26:14 AM]Bob Haugen:
     31 is cleaning a percentage of the week's cleaning, too?
     32 [10:26:19 AM]Chris :
     33 yes
     34 [11:42:49 AM]Lynn Foster:
     35 so bob and i on our walk couldn't think of a clean way to do the cooking and cleaning as all exchanges - 
     36 so we're back to a process that creates x meals in a week, and then some type of exchange where people 
     37 use x % of the meal offerings
     38 [11:44:34 AM]Bob Haugen:
     39 Could have one weekly collective work process with cooking and cleaning both as percentages
     40 [11:44:39 AM]Chris :
     41 or can we track two things, the cooking and the amoutn of meals, separately
     42 ?
     43 [11:44:51 AM]Bob Haugen:
     44 all on one page, along with the number of meals served
     45 [11:45:50 AM]Lynn Foster:
     46 well, you could create the process for the next week during the meeting, and people can enter whenever they want
     47 [11:46:04 AM]Bob Haugen:
     48 Put one collective work process out for every week
     49 people can enter their percentages when they know them
     50 [11:46:17 AM]Chris :
     51 ok, let's try it that way
     52 ok
     53 [11:46:30 AM]Bob Haugen:
     54 somebody can enter the number of meals served
     55 the eating is a little hazier for me
     56 but all of that other stuff can go on one page
     57 [11:47:14 AM]Chris :
     58 ok, sounds like what we would be looking for as our current ideal vision
     59 11:47:54 AM]Bob Haugen:
     60 everything else, the cooking, cleaning and meals served, all on one page
     61 we're still thinking about the eating
     62 but I can try an experiment later today in testocp and you can look at it
     63 [11:48:39 AM]Chris :
     64 the eating doesn't need to be related, I guess, as funny as it sounds
     65 it is a separate revenue, basically
     66 [11:49:24 AM]Lynn Foster:
     67 the eating will be related because the exchange  will track back to the process that created the weekly meals
     68 [11:49:29 AM]Bob Haugen:
     69 the eating can be related to the meals output as an exchnge
     70 [11:49:33 AM]Lynn Foster:
     71 process then exchange, related
     72 [11:49:42 AM]Bob Haugen:
     73 yes, what Lynn said
     74 [11:51:38 AM]Lynn Foster:
     75 is food included in the payment for a room?
     76 [11:51:41 AM]Chris :
     77 it is not inlcuded
     78 [11:51:55 AM]Bob Haugen:
     79 ok,, so it is paid for?
     80 [11:52:05 AM]Chris :
     81 yes
     82 [11:52:16 AM]Bob Haugen:
     83 then it's an exchange, economically
     84 all fits (I think)
     85 11:53:56 AM]Mario:
     86 what do you see as cooking? breakfast, lunch, dinner? So three meals a day?
     87 [11:54:25 AM]Chris :
     88 doesn't matter, because we do percentages
     89 [11:54:32 AM]Lynn Foster:
     90 > Chris 
     91 > either as a contribution that they make at some point
     92 could be either work or financial contribution?
     93 [11:54:36 AM]Chris :
     94 basically, this is left deliberately unclear
     95 [11:55:11 AM]Bob Haugen:
     96 I am warming up to the deliberate unclarity
     97 [11:55:24 AM]Lynn Foster:
     98 :smile:
     99 [11:55:33 AM]Bob Haugen:
    100 different attitude than other groups we've worked with
    101 
    102 
    103